Sangcheol’s Legal Journal : YouLaw Insights

🗓️ Trial Overview Date: June 23, 2025, 10:15 AM Location: Criminal Division 25, Seoul Central District Court (Judge Ji Gu-yeon presiding) Defendant: Former President Yoon Suk-yeol Special Prosecutor Appearance: Cho Eun-seok’s team, represented in court by Deputy Counsel Park Eok-soo Witnesses: Maj. Gen. Lee Jae-sik (Joint Chiefs of Staff, Crisis Readiness Inspector, Chief of Martial Law Secretariat) Col. Kwon Young-hwan (Former Head of Martial Law Division, JCS) 🔍 Key Issues and Proceedings 1. Special Counsel Assumes Prosecutorial Role This hearing marked the debut of the newly formed Special Counsel team, formally taking over public prosecution duties from the original prosecutors. Deputy Counsel Park sat in the lead prosecutor’s seat and requested expedited proceedings, citing the impending expiration of detention for some defendants. 2. Defense Claims Unconstitutional Abuse of Power Yoon’s legal team (Attorneys Wi Hyun-seok, Bae Bo-yoon) argued...

  👋 Introduction: When Politics and Law Collide Hello, and welcome. What happens when the timeline of politics and the timeline of justice crash into each other? In South Korea today, one name sits at the center of this collision: Lee Jae-myung , the presidential candidate from the Democratic Party. While elections are always political, the current controversy is deeply legal as well. That’s because Lee is currently facing multiple high-profile court cases — including charges related to election law and major development scandals. But it's not just the nature of the cases that matters. It's the timing . With the presidential election drawing near, the judiciary's decisions are being seen not only as legal moves — but as potential political interference . ⚖️ Trial Postponed: Why Was the Court Date Moved? Recently, the Seoul High Court postponed the first hearing in Lee Jae-myung's election law violation case. Originally set for May 15, the trial has now ...

Hello everyone! 👋 Today’s blog post covers an extraordinary moment in Korean constitutional history.  On April 4, 2025 , the Constitutional Court of Korea issued a landmark ruling: the dismissal of President Yoon Suk-yeol from office. Let’s explore what happened, why it happened, and what this means for democracy in Korea. 🧭 Background of the Case The impeachment process began after President Yoon declared martial law on December 3, 2024 , citing national paralysis due to opposition party actions and threats from North Korea. The declaration was made through a live national broadcast and included assigning a military general as the martial law commander. However, within hours, the National Assembly voted unanimously (190/190) to revoke the martial law. On December 4, President Yoon announced the termination of the martial law . Despite this retraction, political and legal responses escalated. A second impeachment motion was proposed and passed on December 14 with 204 ...

  In a historic and politically charged moment, the Constitutional Court of South Korea is set to deliver its final verdict on the impeachment of President Yoon Suk-yeol. The court announced that the decision will be made public on Friday, April 4, 2025, at 11:00 AM , at the Grand Courtroom in Jongno-gu, Seoul. The announcement follows 111 days after the National Assembly passed the impeachment motion and 38 days after the final hearings concluded on March 25. The outcome of this ruling holds significant implications not just for the current administration but for the broader framework of constitutional law and democratic governance in South Korea. This pivotal moment comes amidst growing scrutiny from both political circles and the public, as the nation stands at the crossroads of legal accountability and executive authority. A Decision with Immediate Impact The court's verdict will determine whether President Yoon will continue to lead the country or be permanently removed f...