[Trial Recap] 12th Hearing in Sedition Trial of Yoon Suk-yeol (July 24, 2025)


 

12th Hearing Summary – July 24, 2025

Yoon Suk-yeol Sedition Trial
Seoul Central District Court, Criminal Division 25 (Presiding Judge Ji Gui-yeon)


🗓️ Overview

  • Date: July 24, 2025, 10:15 AM

  • Defendant: Yoon Suk-yeol (Former President)

  • Location: Courtroom 417, Seoul Central District Court

  • Witness: Colonel Kim Bong-gyu (ROK Defense Intelligence Command)


🔍 Key Developments

  1. Third Consecutive Absence of Yoon Suk-yeol
    Yoon failed to appear for the third time since his re-detention. The court initiated an investigation into whether his absences constitute unjustified refusal under the Criminal Procedure Act. The presiding judge announced that Yoon’s medical condition and his ability to be forcibly brought to court would be verified through the detention facility.

  2. Special Prosecutor Demands Arrest Warrant for Compulsory Appearance
    The prosecution argued that Yoon’s health claims were already dismissed during the habeas corpus hearing. They emphasized that he had attended nine hearings previously and even spoke during a recent 4-hour bail hearing—proving his capability to participate. They requested the court issue an arrest warrant to ensure attendance.

  3. Defense Argues Constitutional Violation of the Special Prosecutor Act
    Yoon’s lawyers claimed that the very foundation of the special prosecutor’s authority is unconstitutional and announced plans to request a constitutional review. They further argued that the prosecution's conduct amounts to a political suppression campaign.

  4. Colonel Kim Bong-gyu’s Testimony on Martial Law Plot
    Colonel Kim testified that he received a confidential document from former Intel Chief Noh Sang-won in November 2024—one month before the December 3 martial law declaration. The document outlined actions under "martial law conditions," including instructions to detain 30 National Election Commission employees and move them to a military bunker.
    Kim further revealed that Noh stated, "Call me Director. I will personally interrogate Chairman Noh Tae-ak," and implied intent to lead a special military task force targeting alleged election fraud.

  5. Tensions Over Trial Schedule During Court Recess
    The prosecution requested additional hearing dates—even during court recess—citing urgent public interest. Yoon’s defense strongly opposed, labeling the proposal impractical and offensive, particularly regarding mention of appointing public defenders in case of further no-shows.


👤 Witness Background: Colonel Kim Bong-gyu

  • Position: Senior officer in the ROK Defense Intelligence Command

  • Status: Currently indicted as a co-conspirator in the sedition case

  • Role: Participated in pre-martial law planning meetings with ex-Intel Chiefs

  • Key Allegations: Helped organize covert plans to seize NEC infrastructure, including instructions to forcibly detain personnel and manage a second-tier investigation unit ("Unit 2") led by ex-commander Noh Sang-won


🔁 Disputes Summary

Issue Prosecution Defense
Yoon’s Absence Unjustified, warrants arrest Due to health + unconstitutional investigation
Special Prosecutor Legitimacy Properly authorized by law Violates Constitution, request for review planned
Martial Law Planning Coordinated, targeted NEC and public institutions No official act by Yoon confirmed
Recess Hearings Necessary for speedy resolution Unrealistic, request for public defender is offensive

🏷️ Tags

#YoonSukYeol #SeditionTrial #MilitaryPlot #MartialLaw #ColonelKimTestimony #ElectionInterference #SpecialProsecutor #ConstitutionalDispute #SeoulCentralCourt


📌 Key Timeline Recap

DateEvent
2024.12.03Martial law declared (origin of sedition case)
2024.12.14National Assembly passes impeachment motion
2024.12.18/25/29Yoon refuses Corruption Office summons (3 times)
2024.12.31Arrest warrant issued
2025.01.03First arrest attempt fails (residence standoff)
2025.01.15Yoon arrested
2025.01.19Detention approved at 3 a.m.
2025.01.26Indicted by Special Investigation HQ
2025.03.07Detention ruled unlawful, Yoon released
2025.04.04Constitutional Court upholds impeachment
2025.04.11Yoon formally vacates presidential residence
2025.07.10        Yoon Suk-yeol Re-arrest
2025.07.18.       The motion to review the legality of detention -> denied. 



🧾 Hearings Summary

1st Hearing (2025.04.14)

  • Closed-door session for security reasons.

  • Yoon gave a 93-minute lecture-like speech targeting prosecutors and the bench.

2nd Hearing (2025.04.21)

  • Witnesses: Col. Cho Sung-hyun, Lt. Col. Kim Hyung-ki.

  • Testified they refused unlawful orders to storm parliament.

3rd Hearing (2025.05.12)

  • Witnesses: Capt. Oh Sang-bae, Brig. Gen. Park Jung-hwan.

  • Testified Yoon gave orders to “shoot through doors” and “declare martial law multiple times.”

4th Hearing (2025.05.19)

  • Brig. Gen. Park stated he heard Maj. Gen. Kwak shouting “Break down the doors” and “Drag them out.”

  • Presented Kwak's handwritten notes from the night of the incident.

5th Hearing (2025.05.26)

  • Witness: Brig. Gen. Lee Sang-hyun.

  • Said Kwak ordered raids on the National Assembly and DP headquarters on Yoon’s instruction.

  • Quoted Kwak relaying Yoon's words: “Use an axe to break in and drag them out.”

6th Hearing (2025.06.09)

  • Lee reaffirmed the order came directly from President Yoon.

  • Related audio was played in court.

  • Yoon appeared wearing a pink-patterned tie, remained silent throughout.

7th Hearing (2025.06.19)

  • Brig. Gen. Kim Chul-jin testified he heard Yoon say, “You should’ve sent 1,000 troops.”

  • Prosecutors claimed it proved intent to escalate martial enforcement.

8th Hearing (2025.06.23)

  • Prosecutors called for expedited trial due to detention timing.

  • Witnesses: Brig. Gen. Lee Jae-sik and Col. Kwon Young-hwan.

  • Both emphasized that “preventive martial law is impossible” and political rights can't be suspended.

9th Hearing (2025.07.03)

  • Dispute over legality of Special Counsel’s authority, focusing on distinction between “handover” and “transfer.”
  • Witnesses: Col. Kwon Young-hwan and Col. Koh Dong-hee.
  • Col. Kwon criticized the martial law decree’s unusual focus on doctors; Col. Koh described server room seizure and expressed moral unease.

10th Hearing Summary (2025.07.10)

  • Yoon Suk-yeol was absent from court for the first time, citing health issues and challenging the constitutionality of the Special Prosecutor.

  • Prosecutors pushed for a warrant of compulsory appearance, warning against prolonged absence.

  • Key witness Jeong Sung-woo (former Defense Counterintelligence Director) testified that the order to seize the Election Commission server came directly from the President and Defense Minister on December 3, 2024, at 10:50 p.m.

  • Jeong stated he paused execution due to constitutional concerns, fearing it might mirror the 5.18 Gwangju military abuse.

  • The court noted inconsistencies in Yoon’s health excuse, as he had appeared early for a detention review earlier that week.

11th Trial Summary – July 24, 2025
  • Yoon Suk-yeol failed to appear for the second consecutive hearing; his defense cited health deterioration and challenged the constitutionality of the special prosecutor.

  • The court expressed concern over prolonged absences, while the prosecution requested an arrest warrant to compel appearance.

  • Colonel Jeong Seong-woo testified that Defense Security Commander Yeo In-hyung gave orders to seize the National Election Commission servers on December 3, 2024, citing "presidential instructions."

  • The order was issued at 10:50 PM, but Jeong delayed execution due to constitutional concerns.

  • He warned of a potential "May 18-like incident" and described heightened tension within the military.


댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

Reevaluating the 10.26 Incident: The Retrial of Kim Jae-gyu and Its Impact on South Korean History

South Korea’s Civil Code Revision: Key Changes and Implications

Korean Constitutional Court to Rule on President Yoon's Impeachment April 4th